ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Statistical learning of target location guides attention proactively.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our perceptual system is highly sensitive to statistical regularities in our environment. In particular, we respond faster to targets that appear in frequently attended locations-a phenomenon known as target-location probability learning (LPL). Is attention proactively aligned with the high-probability target location, or reactively allocated to that location when the learning context is detected? The studies that addressed this question tested whether a spatial attentional bias learned in one task transfers to another. However, they yielded conflicting findings and were open to alternative accounts. We reexamined whether LPL-guided attention is proactively allocated to the high-probability target location while addressing these previous studies' potential caveats, in two experiments. During learning, the search target appeared more often at one location than elsewhere, and during extinction, all search target locations were equiprobable. In both learning and extinction, letter-probe trials were interspersed among the search trials. We found that LPL acquired during search transferred to the letter-probe task during both learning and extinction. Importantly, during extinction, participants continued to prioritize the previously high-probability location on both search and letter-probe trials, even when they were informed after the learning phase that the bias would be discontinued and were asked to start their search at the location indicated by an arrow precue. We conclude that LPL guides attention proactively and inflexibly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.