ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens in the Oral Cavity of White (Carcharodon carcharias), Bull (Carcharhinus leucas) and Tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) Sharks from the East Coast of Australia.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Australia has one of the highest incidences of shark bites worldwide. Previous research on sharks has detected antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria in the oral cavity, however, no such research has been conducted on species found in Australasian waters. In this study, 197 bacterial isolates were obtained from oral swabs taken from 153 sharks, including white (Carcharodon carcharias), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier) and bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) caught on the east coast of Australia between May 2018 and April 2022. Isolates were identified using MALDI-TOF, and a disc diffusion assay was used to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of 72 isolates considered potential pathogens, including members of the genera Pseudomonas, Vibrio, Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Klebsiella and Psychrobacter. Resistance to one or more antibiotics was common, with 60%, 73%, and 74% of isolates from white, tiger and bull sharks resistant to one or more antibiotics, respectively. This research provides insights into which antibiotics are most suitable for treating shark bite wounds in eastern Australia, and possibly more broadly, to prevent infection. This study identified that over 51% of pathogens in the oral cavity of Australian sharks are resistant to one or more antibiotics, with most pathogens being resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. This research provides important information for medical professionals when it comes to treaty wounds inflicted by shark bites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.