Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399656›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

An Exploratory Analysis of Chemical and Mechanical VTE Prophylaxis in Patients with High Rebleeding Risk Traumatic Brain Injury.

Heather X Rhodes-Lyons, Adel Elkbuli, Sanjan Kumar, Nikita Nunes Espat, Sarah E Johnson, David L McClure, Antonio Pepe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather X Rhodes-LyonsCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA. rhodes.heather@marshfieldresearch.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6003-3654
Adel ElkbuliDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgical Education, Orlando Regional Medical Center, 52 W Underwood St, Orlando, FL, 32806, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-617X
Sanjan KumarUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, 6850 Lake Nona Blvd, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-4078
Nikita Nunes EspatNOVA Southeastern University, Kiran Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, 3200 S University Dr, Davie, FL, 33314, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5625-3707
Sarah E JohnsonGrand Strand Medical Center, Department of Trauma, 809 82nd Parkway, Myrtle Beach, SC, 29572, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-8649-4897
David L McClureCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, 1000 North Oak Avenue, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8470-7190
Antonio PepeGrand Strand Medical Center, Department of Trauma, 809 82nd Parkway, Myrtle Beach, SC, 29572, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-9348-9427

Funding

Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation 255800-00-RES SUPPT TRAUMA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little research on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (PPX) timing of the higher rebleeding risk groups based on size and type of traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to exclusion from previous observational studies, which prohibits the facilitation of an evidence-based strategy. We aim to determine the effect of VTE PPX timing on the high rebleeding risk TBI population based on the modified Berne Norwood Criteria.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File from 2017 to 2022. The study population consisted of adult patients who received chemical or mechanical PPX with no missing times and had a blunt high rebleeding risk TBI stratified by a comorbid history of anticoagulation or bleeding disorder with excluded polytrauma. There was a total of 12 exposure groups based on VTE PPX timing with the outcomes of interest being intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ventilation days, and mortality.

resultsA total of 13,016 patients were included in the exploratory analysis. Early initiation of chemical VTE PPX (within ≤ 24 h) was associated with a reduced likelihood of prolonged ICU stay and ventilation days, regardless of prior anticoagulation use or bleeding disorder. In contrast, inferior vena cava filter placement within the > 24-h to < 72-h window was associated with increased ICU and ventilation duration.

conclusionsThis study highlights the benefits of initiating chemical VTE PPX within 24 h for patients wih high rebleeding risk TBI, demonstrating significant reductions in ICU stays and ventilation days without an increase in mortality rates. Additionally, although inferior vena cava filters are associated with longer ICU stays and increased ventilation days, this may reflect the greater severity and potential mortality risk of the conditions being treated.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBrain Injuries, TraumaticVenous ThromboembolismAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSecondary PreventionAnticoagulantsAnticoagulationIntensive care unitProphylaxis timingRebleeding riskTraumatic brain injuryVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.