SynthesisMolecular and cellular biochemistry2025
Risk factors for cognitive decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence, risk factors, and early prediction of cognitive impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive decline (CD) is a common disorder in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is affected by various factors. The present study aimed to investigate the factors affecting its occurrence CD in patients T2DM. The PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched for pertinent research on the risk factors for the beginning of CD. The remaining studies were assessed using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria after duplicate studies were eliminated. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 2) was used to analyze the data. The Egger test and Begg and Mazumdar test was used to examine publication bias, while the I-square statistic was used to evaluate study heterogeneity. 95% confidence limits and odds ratios were used in the analysis. 40 studies were authorized for assessment and statistical analysis using the systematic review procedure. These studies' findings indicate that, using both crude and adjusted analyses, the odds ratio for the occurrence of CD in people with diabetes is higher for factors like low educational attainment, men, abnormal Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) levels, physical inactivity, depression, and stroke. Factors like low education, abnormal HbA1C levels, depression, and stroke as well increase the risk of developing CD in diabetic patients. These cases in diabetic patients require special attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40399638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.