ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025
Race, discrimination, and mental health adversity in Canada.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCanada is undergoing a crisis in mental health, and the federal government has established a strategy that is attentive to mental health among Black people. Our objective is to inform this work by understanding the relationships between race, discrimination, and mental health outcomes.
methodsWe obtained a sample of 17,526 respondents from the Canadian Community Health Survey Rapid Response Module on Experiences of Discrimination, which asked about respondent race and other sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the validated Williams Everyday Discrimination Scale, and mental health outcomes (mood and anxiety disorders, substance use, and self-rated mental health). We ran descriptive statistics as well as crude, sociodemographic- and socioeconomic-adjusted logistic regressions to assess relationships in the overall sample between race and the Williams Discrimination Scale and between the Williams Discrimination Scale and mental health outcomes.
resultsCompared to white people, Black people had two to three times the odds of experiencing frequent discrimination, while Asian people were not statistically different from white people. Frequent experiences of everyday discrimination in the sample were associated with between 40% and two times the odds of experiencing adverse mental health outcomes, though white people had the highest prevalences of adverse mental health outcomes in the sample.
conclusionIn Canada, experiences of discrimination can produce adverse mental health outcomes, and Black people in particular experience high degrees of discrimination compared to all other racial groups. National health surveys should contain larger and more representative samples of non-white individuals, which allow for more complex analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.