Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399569›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

A self-supervised learning approach for high throughput and high content cell segmentation.

Van K Lam, Jeff M Byers, Michael C Robitaille, Logan Kaler, Joseph A Christodoulides, Marc P Raphael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Van K LamUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.
Jeff M ByersUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.
Michael C RobitailleUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.
Logan KalerUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6502-5773
Joseph A ChristodoulidesUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA.
Marc P RaphaelUS Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, USA. marc.p.raphael.civ@us.navy.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1794-5193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, ML/AI-based algorithms should enable rapid and accurate cell segmentation in high-throughput settings. However, reliance on large training datasets, human input, computational expertise, and limited generalizability has prevented this goal of completely automated, high-throughput segmentation from being achieved. To overcome these roadblocks, we introduce an innovative self-supervised learning method (SSL) for pixel classification that does not require parameter tuning or curated data sets, and instead trains itself on the end-users' own data in a completely automated fashion, thus providing a more efficient cell segmentation approach for high-throughput, high-content image analysis. We demonstrate that our algorithm meets the criteria of being fully automated with versatility across various magnifications, optical modalities, and cell types. Moreover, our SSL algorithm is capable of identifying complex cellular structures and organelles, which are otherwise easily missed, thereby broadening the machine learning applications to high-content imaging. Our SSL technique displayed consistently high F1 scores across segmented cell images, with scores ranging from 0.771 to 0.888, matching or outperforming the popular Cellpose algorithm, which showed a greater F1 variance of 0.454 to 0.882, primarily due to more false negatives.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40399569
PMCPMC12095644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.