ArticleCalcified tissue international2025
The Association Between Two Different Non-invasive Advanced Glycation End Products and Osteoporosis in the Non-diabetic Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are associated with osteoporosis (OP) in the diabetic population. However, their relationship with OP in the non-diabetic population remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate cross-sectional associations of AGEs levels in the skin and lens with OP in the non-diabetic population. A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 652 participants was conducted. Bone mineral density (BMD) was quantified by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Lens and skin AGEs were assessed by lens and skin autofluorescence (LAF and SAF). This study included 652 individuals, 280 males (42.9%) and 372 females (57.1%), with a mean age of (55.5 ± 6.9) years. The population with osteopenia exhibited significantly higher levels of SAF-AGEs than those with normal BMD, while the population with OP had significantly higher levels of both SAF- and LAF-AGEs. After adjusting for age and body mass index, LAF-AGEs were negatively correlated with BMD at the femoral neck and total hip. In contrast, SAF-AGEs were negatively correlated with BMD at the lumbar1-4 spine. Furthermore, multiple linear stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that LAF-AGEs were negatively associated with BMD at both the femoral neck and total hip. However, SAF-AGEs showed no association with BMD at any of the three measured sites. Additionally, after adjusting for other covariates, the logistic regression analysis emphasized that LAF-AGEs were associated with OP in the non-diabetic population, but SAF-AGEs do not. The results revealed a significant correlation between LAF-AGEs and OP in the non-diabetic population and their potential clinical utility warrants further validation. Therefore, we urge for larger longitudinal analyses and experimental research to validate and extend these cross-sectional findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40399568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.