ArticleOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Periprosthetic fracture in hip replacement-risk factors and treatment].
Article in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriprosthetic acetabular fractures primarily pose a problem with cementless implantation techniques and occur in approximately 3.6% of primary and up to 20.9% of revision cases. When a fracture situation exists that affects the integrity of the pelvic columns, stabilization using plate osteosynthesis is necessary, in addition to the implantation of a revision cup. Periprosthetic femoral fractures also primarily occur with cementless techniques and account for 0.4-6.8% of revisions after primary total hip arthroplasty. In addition to the cementless technique, the most common risk factors for the development of PFF are a minimally invasive, ventral approach, female gender, poor bone quality, age > 75 years, and revision surgery. TREATMENT: Depending on the degree of risk to the stability of the implant, conservative or surgical treatment can be carried out using osteosynthesis, stem replacement or a combination of both procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.