ArticleEcoHealth2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment for Canine Parasites in Remote Indigenous Communities.
Article in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Zoonotic Parasites and Genetic Diversity ofJournal of parasitology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zoonotic canine parasites and the vector-borne diseases they may carry can cause high morbidity and mortality in dogs and people. Many remote Indigenous communities in northern Australia have numerous free-roaming dogs, tropical climates favouring parasite development, and limited access to veterinary care, which can promote high prevalence of zoonotic parasites. To successfully combat parasites, treatment programs are needed, which are effective in reducing parasite burden and prevalence as well as being cost-effective and feasible. We compared canine parasite treatments in a Torres Strait Islander community setting, including oxibendazole/praziquantel tablets (OXI), moxidectin/imidacloprid spot-on (MOX), off-label oral ivermectin (IVM), afoxolaner chews (AFO), and flumethrin/imidacloprid collars (FLU). Cost surveys estimated the total annual and per-dog cost of each program. Markov modelling determined the cost per dog free of infection for each program using a government payer perspective over six-month and four-year time horizons. The annual cost per dog treated was $54.53 for OXI, $95.44 for MOX, $22.85 for IVM, $219.79 for AFO and $133.95 for FLU. IVM was less costly and more effective than other treatments against hookworm. FLU dominated in ectoparasite treatment. Sensitivity analyses supported these results. This study contributes cost-effectiveness data to inform parasite treatment program policy with aims of significant reductions in zoonotic canine parasite prevalence and subsequent reductions in environmental contamination with infectious parasite stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.