ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Management of chronic-phase CML in later lines: a Hong Kong consensus recommendation.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) usually requires long-term therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While these agents have markedly advanced the clinical management and prognosis of CML, a subset of patients experience treatment resistance or suboptimal response, necessitating multiple lines of TKI therapy. Few treatment options exist for patients who are resistant or intolerant to first- and second-line therapies. To provide guidance for the management of patients in chronic-phase failing at least two lines of treatment, a literature review followed by consensus generation from an expert panel with a modified Delphi process was conducted. This was followed by a meeting in person and subsequent online iterations for the establishment of a list of consensus guidelines. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of respondents selecting either 'accept completely' or 'accept with some reservation'. Overall, 17 statements were formulated covering five topics - defining treatment failure and acceptable treatment response, in terms of efficacy and intolerance; sequencing therapy to prevent disease progression and improve quality of life; managing patients with broad resistance, specific mutations, and risk of cardiovascular events; considering timing of cytogenetic or molecular response; and mitigating risk when using novel therapies and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. These comprehensive, evidence-based recommendations will assist clinicians in managing their patients with CML in third and later lines of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.