ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between prediagnostic risk factors and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis in Golesten cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fueling or Fighting Cancer? The Thermogenic Paradox of Brown Adipose Tissue.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- Prognostic Factors and Biomarker Performance in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Reduced-Dose 5-Fluorouracil Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the survival rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the association between several pre-diagnostic factors, including demographic, anthropometric, behavioral, nutritional, lifestyle, and medical history and CRC incidence and survival. Among 50,045 participants in the Golestan cohort study, 190 patients diagnosed with CRC during the follow-up period were included in this study. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier were used for analysis. The CRC incidence risk was significantly higher in males (HR = 2.20; 1.54-3.14), adults aged 50-70 years (HR = 1.86, 1.36-2.55), adults aged 70 years and older (HR = 3.71; 2.13-6.44), and urban dwellers (HR = 1.74; 1.22-2.47). The 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year overall survival was 60.3%, 47.5%, and 35.2%, respectively. Higher pre-diagnostic socio-economic status (SES) was associated with a significantly decreased mortality (HR = 0.55; 0.34-0.89). While, age 70 years and older (HR = 2.79; 1.12-6.99), pre-diagnostic opium use (HR = 2.35; 1.36-4.07), and metastasis (HR = 2.97; 1.97-4.48) were associated with a significantly increased mortality. Health policies should be implemented to enhance healthcare services and screening programs in low-SES areas. The general population, especially males and adults aged 50 years and older should be informed about CRC screening, CRC symptoms, and healthy lifestyles and diets. Furthermore, there is a critical need to raise awareness about the harmful effects of opium on CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.