ArticleScientific reports2025
Imbalanced feature generation based on bootstrap power spectral curve for estimating respiratory rate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid respiratory rate (RR) changes in older adults may indicate serious illness. Therefore, accurately estimating RR for cardiorespiratory fitness is essential. However, machine learning algorithm-related errors are unsuitable for medical decision-making processes because some data have a much larger sample size in the training set than in other sets. This difference in size refers to data imbalance. Therefore, we introduce a novel methodology combining bootstrap-based imbalanced feature generation (BIFG) with the Gaussian process for estimating RR and uncertainty, thereby addressing data imbalance. The sample difference between normal breathing (12-20 bpm), dyspnea (≥20 bpm), and hypopnea (<8 bpm) indicates significant data imbalance, which can affect the learning of the machine learning algorithm. Thus, the normal breathing part with much data is well-trained. The dyspnea and hypopnea parts with relatively little data are not well-trained, and this data imbalance causes significant errors concerning the reference variables in the actual dyspnea and hypopnea data parts. Hence, we use the parametric bootstrap model generated by artificial feature curves to estimate RR and solve this problem. As a result, the non-parametric bootstrap approach drastically increased the number of artificial feature curves. The generated artificial feature curves are selectively utilized for the highly imbalanced parts. Therefore, BIFG can be efficiently trained to predict the complex nonlinear relationships between the feature vectors obtained from the photoplethysmography signals and the reference RR. The proposed methodology exhibits more accurate predictive performance and uncertainty. The mean absolute errors are 0.89 and 1.44 beats per minute for RR using the proposed BIFG based on the two data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.