ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning based multi attribute evaluation for holistic student assessment in physical education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of students in physical education remains a formidable challenge due to the limitations of traditional assessment approaches, which are often excessively one-dimensional. This study proposes a solution utilizing deep learning via multi-attribute user evaluation modelling to address these issues. This development proposal utilizes all available data, including physical activities, cognitive tasks, emotional responses, and social interactions, for a comprehensive assessment of student performance. The methodology comprises a ten-step process that involves information collection, preparation, model construction, and deployment, followed by regular review and adjustments. The model has considerable efficacy, with a high level of accuracy and reduced errors. Moreover, an experimental investigation illustrates its robustness, having attained a low mean score. The analysis indicates that the current models exhibit more flexibility in providing personalized feedback to improve educational outcomes and enhance decision-making. Moreover, the model incorporates visualization tools such as heatmaps, which affirm the system's ability to monitor performance and progressively adjust to the dynamics of students. The developed approach incorporates automated, objective, and scalable attributes that improve student assessment. This also aids in tackling many multi-faceted challenges in physical education while formulating effective interventions for student advancement. Subsequent research may focus on the integration of real-time sensor data, enhancement of computational efficiency, and wider application across diverse educational organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.