ArticleScientific reports2025
Retrospective database study of druggable mutation detection among patients with non-small cell lung cancer in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Somatic and Germline EGFR Mutations in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- Lipid metabolism-related gene expression predicts prognostic outcomes in lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling in 175 Japanese patients with advanced skin malignancies refractory to standard therapies.JAAD international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generally, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 90% of lung cancer cases in Japan. The detection of druggable mutations is necessary for selecting the appropriate systemic therapy for patients with NSCLC. This study explored the proportion, characteristics, and treatments of patients with druggable mutations detected following standard therapy using cancer gene panel (CGP) testing. Adult NSCLC cases who had not been previously confirmed to have druggable mutations before CGP testing were extracted from the national database. A total of 1,425 cases were included and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Among the patients with NSCLC who underwent CGP testing, 44.6% exhibited druggable mutations (n = 635; mean age, 63.9 ± 10.7 years; 439 men [69.1%]). The most common types of mutations among those with druggable mutations were EGFR and NTRK, whereas the most common cancer subtypes were lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma. The median number of days from primary treatment initiation to druggable mutation detection was 701. As the first treatment after the CGP testing, 23.0% of the patients received molecularly targeted agents. Our findings emphasize the clinical importance of reducing barriers that hinder upfront multigene testing for driver gene mutations in ensuring patients receive appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.