Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399427›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Clinical efficacy observation of repetitive magnetic stimulation for treating upper limb spasticity after stroke.

Zhifa Wang, Qing Liu, Dongxia Li, Ligang Wei, Erxing Chu, Yangdong Bao, Zhen Liu, Lei Jin, Xiaoxia Chen, Kai Zhao

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke spasticity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhifa Wang *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Qing Liu *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Dongxia LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Ligang WeiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Erxing ChuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Yangdong BaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Zhen LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Lei JinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Xiaoxia ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, P. R. China. zkfzr@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for managing upper limb muscular spasticity after stroke, and to examine its therapeutic effects on spasticity and motor function in the upper limb. A total of 110 post-stroke patients with upper limb spasticity were randomly assigned to the experimental or the control group. The experimental group received rTMS in conjunction with conventional rehabilitation therapy. The affected side of the head received daily treatment for 20 min each at Erb's point and the stimulation point, totaling 15 sessions over six days per week. The stimulation frequencies were 10 Hz (high frequency, M1 region) and 1 Hz (low frequency, Erb's point), with an intensity at 120% of the threshold. The control group received sham stimulation alongside conventional rehabilitation therapy. Assessments including the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FM-UE), were also conducted before treatment initiation and after 15 rounds of rTMS. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted using independent-sample t-tests for FM-UE scores and Mann-Whitney U tests for MAS scores to assess heterogeneity in treatment responses by stroke type (cerebral infarction vs. intracerebral hemorrhage). Among these 110 patients, 25 patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. Hence, 53 patients were included in the control group and 32 patients were included in the experimental group. Following 15 rounds of rTMS, the experimental group exhibited a reductions in MAS score (P = 0.004). FM-UE scores increased significantly in both groups (both P < 0.05), with significant improvement observed in the experimental group (P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in FM-UE or MAS outcomes between stroke types, likely due to the limited sample size of intracerebral hemorrhage participants (experimental group: n = 8; control group: n = 16). rTMS effectively alleviates upper limb spasticity and enhances motor function after stroke by modulating cortical and spinal nerve excitability.

Indexed as

Muscle SpasticityStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationUpper ExtremityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeClinical efficacyManagementRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationStrokeUpper limb spasticity

Identifiers

PMID40399427
PMCPMC12095486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.