ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved functional assessment in cancer patients using home-based digital technologies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03952767 (The STEPP Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The STEPP Study: Sensors To Evaluate Physical Performance
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of performance status (PS) in oncology care is crucial for improving clinical decisions, therapy selection and anticipated risks of treatment toxicity. While physical function is traditionally assessed in the clinic, in-clinic instruments do not capture the full spectrum of daily functioning. Digital health technologies (DHTs) can address this limitation by passively monitoring patients in their daily environment. Our study showed at-home physical activity and gait metrics from DHTs were associated with self-reported PS in participants with cancer, and these metrics had greater discriminatory power than in-clinic measures among this cohort. The DHT-derived metrics were also significantly correlated with patient-reported-outcomes, and used of the devices was broadly acceptable to study participants. Therefore, integrating DHTs into oncological practice could significantly refine how PS is measured and utilized, ultimately enhancing treatment decision-making and clinical outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03952767).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.