ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the effects of global value chain participation, technological eco-innovation and natural resource rents on environmental quality in the EU-14.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Countries' participation in the global value chain is significant since it offers them economic benefits. However, the sustainability of life on Earth depends on figuring out how participation in the global value chain affects the environment. Therefore, examining the environmental effects of participation in the global value chain is crucial for the formation, development, or modification of policies concerning nations' participation in the global value chain. This study aims to examine the influence of variables such as participation in global value chains, technological eco-innovation, natural resource rents, GDP, and population growth on the degradation of the environment in the EU-14 nations. Indicators of environmental deterioration in the research included carbon emissions and ecological footprint. Data on population growth, economic development, carbon emissions, and natural resource rents were all taken from the World Bank database and utilized in the research. Data on ecological footprints, global value chain involvement, and technical eco-innovation were gathered from the Global Footprint Network, the UIBE GVC Laboratory, and the OECD database, respectively. The MMQR approach was used in the research to analyze yearly data for EU-14 nations spanning the years 2007-2021. KRLS and Driscoll-Kraay techniques were also used in the research to assess robustness. The findings indicate that participation in the global value chain across EU-14 nations leads to a decrease in carbon emissions and ecological footprint, resulting in enhanced environmental quality within these countries. Once again, research indicates that in EU-14 nations, technological eco-innovation lowers carbon emissions and ecological footprint. At all quantile levels, it is also discovered that natural resource rents raise carbon emissions and ecological footprint. Additionally, it was discovered that the outcomes of the robustness test agreed with the conclusions drawn. According to the study's findings, the EU-14 countries should give priority to eco-friendly value chain management techniques in order to maintain environmental quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.