ArticleScientific reports2025
Fish use of deep-sea sponge habitats evidenced by long-term high-resolution monitoring.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) to assess benthic communities associated with offshore wind farms: insights and future directions.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Tools and approaches for mapping Marine Animal Forests: A practical overview for researchers and conservationists.Open research Europe · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is critical that fish's habitat uses of benthic habitats are understood, to inform effective fisheries management and to predict the impacts of human activities and climate change. In this study, benthic landers were used to collect long-term high-temporal resolution data to gain insights into the habitat use of sponge grounds by fish at the Sambro Bank Conservation Area. An integrated ecosystem-based monitoring approach was used, involving data collected on the biology, food supply, and oceanography. Fish abundance, behaviour and complex benthopelagic interactions were analysed over spatial and extended temporal scales (i.e., 30-min intervals from 2021 to 2023). A total of 21 different planktivorous and benthivorous fish taxa were found to utilise the seafloor. We show that sponge grounds can act as a nursery, feeding and shelter habitats for commercially important fish. In-depth analyses of Redfish, urophycid hakes, and Silver Hake revealed distinct diel and seasonal patterns and showed how food, sponge density and current speed are important drivers of their abundance and behaviour. Supported by fishery trawl survey reports, high-temporal resolution benthic ecosystem monitoring revealed the importance of sponge grounds and environmental drivers to commercially important fish. Such information is crucial for developing and implementing robust, evidence-based policy and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.