ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting the availability of power line communication nodes using semi-supervised learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Power Line Communication (PLC) facilitates the usage of power cables to transmit data. The issue is that sending data to unavailable nodes is time-consuming. Machine Learning has solved this by predicting a node having optimum readings. The more the machine learning models learn, the more accurate they become, as the model becomes always updated with the node's continuous availability status, so self-training algorithms have been used. A dataset of 2000 instances of a node of a 500-node implemented PLC network has been collected. These instances consist of CINR(Carrier-to-Interference plus Noise Ratio), SNR(Signal-to-Noise Ratio), and RSSI(Received Signal Strength Indicator) as features for the label, which is a node is UP/Down. The data set has been split into 85% as a training set and 15% as a testing set. 15% of the training data are unlabeled. Self-training classifier has been used to allow Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) and Support Vector Machine (linear and non-linear kernel) to behave in a self-training manner as well as the training of label propagation and label spreading algorithms. Supervised Learning algorithms (Random Forest and logistic regression) have been trained on the dataset to compare the results. The best model is the Label Spreading, which resulted in accuracy equals 94.67%, f1-score equals 0.947, precision is 0.946, and recall equals 0.947 with training time equals 0.018 sec. and memory consumption equals 0.99 MB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.