ArticleScientific reports2025
Unsupervised post-training learning in spiking neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Neuron Models on Spiking Neural Network Performance: A Complexity-based Classification Approach.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human brain is a dynamic system that is constantly learning. It employs a combination of various learning strategies to facilitate complex learning processes. However, implementing biological learning mechanisms into Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) remains challenging; thus, most SNNs are trained with only a single learning strategy such as spike timing dependent plasticity (STDP). Moreover, conventional neural networks are first trained on one dataset and subsequently evaluated on unseen data. In this traditional approach, the weights and structure of the model remain fixed once the training step concludes. In this research, we aim to modify this traditional approach and hypothesize that adding short-term plasticity (STP) to a trained SNN enables the model to learn post-training without changing synaptic weights. In particular, by combining triplet STDP for long-term learning during initial training and STP for short-term learning after training (post-training), we employ multiple learning rules to enhance the biological plausibility and computational abilities of SNNs. In this way, two unsupervised learning pipelines are designed for image classification as a proof of concept, in which the dynamic synapse model, driven by neurotransmitter release and synaptic strength, is integrated into the trained network. The proposed method outperforms traditional training by achieving higher classification accuracy and a faster convergence rate. Consequently, our results show that the concept of post-training learning can be realized by incorporating STP in SNNs. Future studies should extend this concept to other challenges and explore its applicability to new datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.