ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced thermal conductivity of Cu Grafted graphene-C
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermal Conductivity Enhancement of Cu- and Ag-Decorated MWCNT Hybrid Nanofluids Synthesized via Probe Ultrasonication.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Size effect on thermal conductivity and stability of TiORSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This contribution reports for the first time on the enhancement of the thermal conductivity of graphene grafted with Cu nanoparticles-ethylene glycol-based nanofluid (with a relatively low Cu volume concentration of about 0.3% & without any dispersant). This latter nanofluid engineered by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquid Solution (LLSI-PLAL) exhibited a significant thermal conductivity enhancement of 12.6% conjugated to a noteworthy time stability of at least 3 to 4 weeks without any additional dispersing agent of any sort. This latter time stability corroborates with Density Functional Theory as well as the Molecular Dynamic theoretical investigations. These latter showed that the binding affinity of Cu nanoparticles onto graphene nanosheets is far superior relative to those of Au or Ag nanoparticles onto graphene (bridge adsorption energies of -0.58, -0.24, and -0.5 eV for Cu, Ag & Au, respectively). Cost-wise, compared to previously validated Au-Graphene/EG and Ag-Graphene/EG, the reported Cu-Graphene/EG nanofluids would be more suitable for mass production in view of their cost-effectiveness, especially in mass technological applications, including but not limited to heat removal & cooling in data centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.