ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiscale computational modeling of 3D printed continuous Fiber reinforced polymer composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing of Continuous-Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Advances in Multifunctional Integration and Intelligent Manufacturing.Polymers · 2026Review
- Functional Materials for Additive Manufacturing: Materials Design, Processing, and Emerging Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiscale computational modeling of 3D printed continuous Fiber reinforced polymer composites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Printing parameters significantly affect elastic properties of 3DP-CFRPCs. Testing these experimentally would require time and would cost much. Computational material modeling is an adequate technique for studying how 3DP-CFRPCs would behave in varying printing conditions. Material modeling was employed in this work to analyze how elastic properties in 3DP-CFRPCs vary with printing conditions. Pores in the matrix were homogenized by Mori-Tanaka method to calculate bead flexibility. Elastic modulus was found by finite element modeling of Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) with microstructure and printing conditions taken into account. Elastic properties differed in differently microstructured models with more disparity in more intricate structures than in more basic ones. Computational modeling provided insight to elastic properties of 3DP-CFRPCs in varied printing conditions. The results also show that thickness of the layers and interfacial properties determine the elastic properties to a great extent, such that higher thickness of the layers and stronger interfacial bonding lead to higher stiffness. The model also correctly simulated behavior of 3DP-CFRPCs when different printing parameters were used, with low error compared to experimental results. The impact of layer thickness on the mechanical characteristics of 3DP-CFRPCs was determined to be more substantial compared to the effect of printing temperature. The application of offset layup printing techniques enhanced the elastic properties of 3DP-CFRPCs, with the degree of improvement varying based on the orientation. As the level of porosity increased, the influence of pores situated between beads on the overall stiffness of 3DP-CFRPCs gradually diminished, while the impact of matrix pores on the overall stiffness of 3DP-CFRPCs gradually intensified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.