ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of beak trimming and feather spraying with bitter taste compound on feather pecking and welfare of Muscovy ducks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study was conducted to compare the effect of beak trimming and feather spraying with bitter taste compound (almond oil) on feather pecking behavior and duck welfare. A total of 63 healthy male 2-weeks-old Muscovy ducklings were randomly allocated to 3 groups. The first group was the control group (no beak trimming and no feather spraying), ducks in the second group were trimmed by scissors at 3 weeks of age, and birds in the third group were sprayed with bitter almond oil weekly from the age of 3 weeks. Growth performance parameters were evaluated. Some behavioral patterns were recorded by using focal sampling. Feather condition score and serum cortisol level were evaluated. At the end of the experiment, bills were collected for histopathological examination. The results showed that beak trimming with scissors had no negative effects on Muscovy ducks' growth performance and significantly lowered feather pecking bouts resulting in good feather conditions. Feather spraying with bitter almond oil had adverse effects on growth performance, obviously increased feather pecking resulted in deterioration of feather quality and markedly increased the level of cortisol (p < 0.001). Bill morphological analysis with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and S100 stains illustrated that the trimmed beak had an increase in the amount of connective tissue (scar tissue formation), numerous blood vessels, fewer nerve bundles, and no neuroma formation. In the Muscovy ducks' sector, beak trimming with scissors at 3 weeks of age is good practice to control feather pecking and cannibalism without adverse effect on the welfare of ducks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.