ArticleScientific reports2025
Automatic quantification of disgust reactions in mice using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disgust, a primary negative emotion, plays a vital role in protecting organisms from intoxication and infection. In rodents, this emotion has been quantified by measuring the specific reactions elicited by exposure to unpleasant tastes. These reactions were captured on video and manually analyzed, a process that required considerable time and effort. Here we developed a method to automatically count disgust reactions in mice by using machine learning. The disgust reactions were automatically tracked using DeepLabCut as the coordinates of the nose and both front and rear paws. The automated tracking data were split into test and training data, and the latter were combined with manually labeled data on whether a disgust reaction was present and, if so, which type of disgust reaction was present. Then, a random forest classifier was constructed, and the performance of the classifier was evaluated in the test dataset. The total number of disgust reactions estimated by the classifier highly correlated with those counted manually (Pearson's r = 0.97). The present method will decrease the time and effort required to analyze disgust reactions, thus facilitating the implementation of the taste reactivity test in large-scale screening and long-term experiments that necessitate quantifying a substantial number of disgust reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.