Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399321›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Phase recognition in manual Small-Incision cataract surgery with MS-TCN + + on the novel SICS-105 dataset.

Simon Mueller, Bhuvan Sachdeva, Singri Niharika Prasad, Raphael Lechtenboehmer, Frank G Holz, Robert P Finger, Kaushik Murali, Mohit Jain, Maximilian W M Wintergerst, Thomas Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simon MuellerUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany.
Bhuvan SachdevaMicrosoft Research, Bengaluru, India.
Singri Niharika PrasadSankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Raphael LechtenboehmerUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany.
Frank G HolzUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany.
Robert P FingerUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany.
Kaushik MuraliSankara Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mohit JainMicrosoft Research, Bengaluru, India.
Maximilian W M WintergerstUniversity Hospital Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany. maximilian.wintergerst@ukbonn.de.
Thomas SchultzDepartment of Computer Science, B-IT, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) is a prevalent technique in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but understudied with respect to computer assisted surgery. This prospective cross-sectional study introduces the first SICS video dataset, evaluates effectiveness of phase recognition through deep learning (DL) using the MS-TCN + + architecture, and compares its results with the well-studied phacoemulsification procedure using the Cataract-101 public dataset. Our novel SICS-105 dataset involved 105 patients recruited at Sankara Eye Hospital in India. Performance is evaluated with frame-wise accuracy, edit distance, F1-score, Precision-Recall AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The MS-TCN + + architecture performs better on the Cataract-101 dataset, with an accuracy of 89.97% [CI 86.69-93.46%] compared to 85.56% [80.63-92.09%] on the SICS-105 dataset (ROC AUC 99.10% [98.34-99.51%] vs. 98.22% [97.16-99.26%]). The accuracy distribution and confidence-intervals overlap and the ROC AUC values range 46.20 to 94.18%. Even though DL is found to be effective for phase recognition in SICS, the larger number of phases and longer duration makes it more challenging compared to phacoemulsification. To support further developments, we make our dataset open access. This research marks a crucial step towards improving postoperative analysis and training for SICS.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionSurgery, Computer-AssistedAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDeep LearningFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPhacoemulsificationProspective StudiesROC CurveArtificial IntelligencePhacoemulsificationPhase RecognitionSmall-Incision Cataract SurgeryTemporal Action SegmentationVideo Dataset

Identifiers

PMID40399321
PMCPMC12095642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.