ArticleScientific data2025
WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusion of computational and experimental provenance in RO-Crate.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-omics technologies to decipher microbiome functions.Nature communications · 2026Review
- bMINTY: enabling reproducible management of high-throughput sequencing analysis results and their metadata.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Coala: a standard-based framework for converting CWL-described command-line tools into agentic toolsets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Supporting workflow reproducibility by linking bioinformatics tools across papers and executable code.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- An unattended image-processing pipeline for on-the-fly quality assessment and 3D exploration in cryo-EM.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- bio.tools: an expanded web service for research software in the life sciences.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Galaxy for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2026 update.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- IDR searcher: a search engine solution for public image resources.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Ten quick tips to SNIFF out sustainable and secure scientific software.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- FAIR in practice: minimum metadata schema for bioinformatics analytics by machines.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Prenatal monitoring in primary health care: a design science research-based approach to FHIR interoperability.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Managing workflow executions with WESkit.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- FAIR digital twins for biodiversity: enabling data, model, and workflow integration.npj biodiversity · 2026Article
- CBIcall: a configuration-driven framework for variant calling in large sequencing cohorts.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Functional annotation of novel heat stress-responsive genes in rice utilizing public transcriptomes and structurome.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Microbiology Galaxy Lab: The first community-driven gateway for reproducible and FAIR analysis of microbial data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Empowering bioinformatics communities with Nextflow and nf-core.Genome biology · 2025Review
- Haplotype-resolved reference genomes of the sea turtle clade unveil ultra-syntenic genomes with hotspots of divergence.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Long-read microbial genome assembly, gene prediction and functional annotation: a service of the MIRRI ERIC Italian node.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising popularity of computational workflows is driven by the need for repetitive and scalable data processing, sharing of processing know-how, and transparent methods. As both combined records of analysis and descriptions of processing steps, workflows should be reproducible, reusable, adaptable, and available. Workflow sharing presents opportunities to reduce unnecessary reinvention, promote reuse, increase access to best practice analyses for non-experts, and increase productivity. In reality, workflows are scattered and difficult to find, in part due to the diversity of available workflow engines and ecosystems, and because workflow sharing is not yet part of research practice. WorkflowHub provides a unified registry for all computational workflows that links to community repositories, and supports both the workflow lifecycle and making workflows findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). By interoperating with diverse platforms, services, and external registries, WorkflowHub adds value by supporting workflow sharing, explicitly assigning credit, enhancing FAIRness, and promoting workflows as scholarly artefacts. The registry has a global reach, with hundreds of research organisations involved, and more than 800 workflows registered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.