Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399290›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2025

Computational modelling and neural correlates of reinforcement learning following three-week escitalopram: a double-blind, placebo-controlled semi-randomised study.

Christelle Langley, Graham K Murray, Sophia Armand, Franziska Knolle, Rudolf N Cardinal, Annette Johansen, Peter S Jensen, Jianfeng Feng, Dea S Stenbæk, Gitte M Knudsen and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Punishments Enhance Reward Learning by Modulating Striatal Prediction Errors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christelle LangleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cl798@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5061-2820
Graham K MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-1742
Sophia ArmandNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-3329
Franziska KnolleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rudolf N CardinalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8751-5167
Annette JohansenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-2368
Peter S JensenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jianfeng FengInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Dea S StenbækNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gitte M KnudsenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-6866
Patrick M FisherNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-0611
Barbara J SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-1745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcement learning is a fundamental aspect of adaptive behaviour, since it involves the acquisition and updating of associations between actions and their outcomes based on the rewarding or punishing consequences. Acute experimental manipulations of serotonin have provided compelling evidence for its role in reinforcement learning. However, it remains unknown how more chronic manipulation of serotonin, which holds greater clinical relevance, affects reinforcement learning and the underlying neural mechanisms. Consequently, we aimed to investigate the effect of a three-week administration of the SSRI, escitalopram, on a reinforcement learning paradigm during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The study used a double-blind, placebo-controlled design with 64 healthy volunteers. Participants were semi-randomised, ensuring matched groups for age, sex and intelligence quotient (IQ), to receive either 20 mg of escitalopram (n = 32) or placebo (n = 32) for at least 21 days. We analysed group differences in reinforcement learning using both analysis of covariance as well as innovative hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the reinforcement learning task. Escitalopram reduced learning from punishment during punishment trials. A key novel finding was that there was decreased activation of the intraparietal sulcus in the escitalopram group when compared to the placebo group during reward trials. The involvement of the intraparietal sulcus suggests that escitalopram affects the encoding of value outcome, which may lead to reduced reinforcement sensitivity, and thereby impacting adaptive learning from feedback. Understanding these mechanisms may help to optimize SSRI treatment to mitigate clinical symptoms and improve quality of life for neuropsychiatric patients, by elucidating serotonin's effects on affect, cognition, and behaviour.

Indexed as

BrainCitalopramEscitalopramParietal LobeReinforcement, PsychologySelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAdultBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePunishmentRewardCitalopramEscitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40399290
PMCPMC12095678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.