ArticleNature communications2025
Evidence on scaling forest restoration from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest restoration is a vital strategy to combat climate change, preserve biodiversity, and maintain ecosystem services. Yet scarce evidence exists evaluating the impact of forest recovery interventions at scale. This study estimates the impact of the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact on forest restoration in Brazil. We compare forest change on lands supported by the Pact to change on similar lands, before and after the program started, thereby isolating the causal impact of restoration support. Here we show that the intervention increased restored forest cover by 10-20 percentage points, likely because it helped to overcome key financial and informational barriers faced by private landowners. Larger effects are associated with greater distance to cities and more state-level environmental enforcement. These findings demonstrate that large-scale forest restoration on private land is possible, but that low returns from competing land uses and complementary institutional environments play key roles in supporting these efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.