ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Anchoring the sign-out phase of the Surgical Safety Checklist to emergence from anesthesia: a proof-of-concept quality-improvement study.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable Healthcare: A Perspective on the Current Landscape, Frameworks, Barriers, and Implementation Model in a Quaternary Hospital System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a communication tool used to improve patient safety and teamwork within operating rooms. Unlike the sign-in and timeout phases, the timing for completion of the sign-out phase is ambiguous, lacks a clear and definitive clinical anchor on when to be performed, and fails to capture important safety data related to the patient's emergence from anesthesia, wherein the risks of complications are greatest. We sought to assess perceptions of operating room team members on whether emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor to conduct the SSC sign-out phase.
methodsIn this single-centre proof-of-concept quality-improvement study, the sign-out phase of the SSC was performed following patient emergence from anesthesia. Operating room team members from surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing were approached to complete a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were asked whether, compared with routine sign-out performance, performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety, compliance, communication, team member availability, and quality improvement. Responses were graded on a 5-point Likert scale.
resultsEighty-two operating room team members participated in our study. After experiencing the intervention, most participants agreed or strongly agreed that performing the sign-out phase following emergence from anesthesia maximized patient safety (70.7%), compliance (67.1%), communication (75.6%), and quality improvement (67.0%). More than half agreed that performing the sign-out following emergence from anesthesia maximized team member availability (59.8%).
conclusionThis proof-of-concept quality-improvement study suggests that emergence from anesthesia is an appropriate clinical anchor for the time to perform the SSC sign-out phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.