ArticleOpen heart2025
Disparities in the care and direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management in atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in English primary care between 2018 and 2022: primary care sentinel network database study.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Patterns and Outcomes of Anticoagulation Therapy in Pulmonary Embolism: An Observational Dual-Centre Registry Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn England, most prescribing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) takes place in primary care. The 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines introduced the AF-CARE ((C) comorbidities and risk factors; (A) avoid stroke and thromboembolism by appropriate prescription of oral anticoagulants; (R) rate and rhythm control; (E) evaluation and reassessment should be individualised for every patient, with a dynamic approach) framework to address this.
objectiveTo describe any health disparities in CKD and AF, including anticoagulation management and correct dosing of DOACs.
methodsUsing English primary care sentinel network data from 2018 to 2022, demographics of AF and CKD including anticoagulation and appropriate DOAC dosing according to creatinine clearance and other factors were assessed. The study also examined disparities in CKD and AF in relation to socioeconomic status and ethnicity. We defined socioeconomic status by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), a weighted composite index combining information from the domains of deprivation including income.
resultsOf 10 513 950 people registered with general practices in the sentinel network, 2.9% (n=304 678) were aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of AF. The prevalence of CKD in AF was 26.0% (n=79 210) and 63.3% of people eligible for anticoagulation were prescribed a DOAC. Among the 54 897 people with AF and CKD 3 or 4, greater likelihood of DOAC prescribing was associated with higher socioeconomic status. Socioeconomic disparities in anticoagulation increased through the 5 years. No association was identified between ethnicity and likelihood of being anticoagulated.In terms of correct dosing, there was no association with socioeconomic status. Overdosing was more frequent than underdosing. Incorrect dosing was associated with male sex (OR 0.80 (95% CI 0.74, 0.86)), dementia (OR 0.94 (0.83, 1.07)) and frailty (OR 0.42 (0.37, 0.48)).
conclusionsPeople in the most deprived IMD quintile were least likely to be anticoagulated. Incorrect DOAC dosing was associated with male sex, increasing frailty and dementia. Socioeconomic and health disparities are apparent in anticoagulation prescribing and should be addressed in line with the AF-CARE framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.