ArticleHospital pediatrics2025
Diagnostic Stewardship of Blood Cultures in the Pediatric ICU Using Machine Learning.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe medical community recently experienced a severe shortage of blood culture media bottles. Rates of blood stream infection (BSI) among critically ill children are low. We sought to design a machine learning (ML) model able to identify children at low risk for BSI to improve blood culture diagnostic stewardship.
methodsWe developed and validated an extreme gradient-boosting ML classifier using an existing dataset of retrospective pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients from a single institution. Data from children aged 3 months to 18 years who had a blood culture collected within 24 hours of PICU admission were included. The first 80% of patients (1/1/2011-12/21/2018) were used for model training and the last 20% (12/22/2018-12/25/2020) for testing (temporal validation). All 121 variables from the original dataset (vital sign, laboratory, and other clinical data) were included as predictors. Negative predictive value (NPV) was the primary evaluation metric.
resultsOf the 3121 blood cultures obtained during 2320 PICU admissions (2100 unique children), 205 (6.6%) were positive. Model NPV was 0.997 in the training set and identified 667/2321 (28.7%) of negative cultures. NPV was 0.993 in the test set and identified 151/595 (25.4%) of negative cultures. The number needed to harm was 151 (151 negative blood cultures could be avoided for each false negative prediction). Key predictors included central line presence, temperature rate of change, and mean platelet volume.
conclusionsWe trained and validated an ML model that accurately predicted >25% of subsequently negative blood cultures. If implemented prospectively, such models could help reduce unnecessary blood cultures among low-risk children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.