Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40398495›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie2025

Collaborative Efforts in Pediatric Surgery: Lessons from European Randomized Controlled Trials.

Anne-Fleur R L van Hal, Sara Roman Galdran, Rene M H Wijnen, Judith Leyh, Martin Lacher, John Vlot, Omid Madadi-Sanjani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne-Fleur R L van HalDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7297-1098
Sara Roman GaldranDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Rene M H WijnenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Judith LeyhDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Martin LacherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
John VlotDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Omid Madadi-SanjaniDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric surgery for rare congenital anomalies presents unique challenges, including low patient recruitment, complex regulatory landscapes, and variability in care standards. This paper reflects on the experiences and lessons learned from the MUC-FIRE and STEPS-EA trials, supported by the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA), to provide guidance for future studies.A retrospective review was conducted on the design and execution of these trials, focusing on team composition, endpoint selection, patient recruitment strategies, regulatory compliance, and adaptive methodologies. Insights were derived from study protocols, monitoring reports, and the authors' experiences.Key factors contributing to trial success included multidisciplinary collaboration, leveraging existing research networks, and defining clear, measurable endpoints. Challenges such as recruitment delays, regulatory hurdles, and variations in care were mitigated through flexible protocols, proactive amendments, and stakeholder engagement. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified these difficulties, necessitating innovative strategies and extended timelines.The MUC-FIRE and STEPS-EA trials underscore the critical importance of international collaboration, adaptive strategies, and patient-centered approaches in overcoming the complexities of multicenter RCTs. Lessons from these experiences can inform the design and implementation of future trials, ultimately enhancing evidence generation and improving outcomes for children with rare congenital anomalies.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesMulticenter Studies as TopicPediatricsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicChildCOVID-19EuropeHumansInternational CooperationPatient SelectionResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID40398495
PMCPMC12611477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.