Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40398317›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2025

Breast cancer patient experiences with and preferences for time alone with their cancer care team.

Elizabeth Broadbridge, Maria K Venetis, Katie A Devine, Lauren E Lee, Kathryn Greene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth BroadbridgeDepartment of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. Electronic address: liesl.broadbridge@rutgers.edu.
Maria K VenetisDepartment of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Katie A DevineDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Lauren E LeeDepartment of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Kathryn GreeneDepartment of Communication, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

Comparing post-test genetic counseling with and without pre-test counseling: The evolving landscape for optimizing cancer careF99CA294165 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BROADBRIDGE, ELIZABETH · 2024 to 2025
$73k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA294165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinicians often suggest that breast cancer patients bring a companion with them to cancer-related appointments. However, a companion's presence shifts the interaction at a minimum from dyadic to triadic, with potential consequences for effective communication. It is not well documented how often breast cancer patients have time alone with their cancer team, how long any time alone lasts, and if patients are satisfied with the amount of time alone.

methodsCurrent (undergoing treatment; n = 150) and former patients (treatment completed; n = 202) breast cancer patients who regularly bring a companion with them to their cancer care visits completed an online questionnaire about the time they spend alone with their oncology team.

resultsCurrent patients reported fewer instances of time alone with their care team than former patients. Overall, most patients reported that the frequency of time alone was about right and that they rarely brought up questions or topics that they would not want to raise with their companion present. Of the patients who reported having no time alone (n = 38), the primary reported reason was that they did not want time alone with their cancer care team.

conclusionsApproximately 1 in 3-4 patients reported that there were questions or topics that they feel more comfortable raising when they have time alone with their healthcare team, representing an important need for these patients. Most patients reported wanting time alone with their cancer care team and reported being satisfied with the amount they do have. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Results are a positive reflection on the amount and frequency of time alone that breast cancer patients desire throughout the cancer care trajectory. To support patient communication needs, clinicians should provide at least some time alone with their patients, particularly when the patient regularly attends visits with a companion and may otherwise not have the opportunity to be alone with their cancer care team.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCommunicationPatient Care TeamPatient PreferencePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsBreast cancerCompanionPatient-provider communicationSupport personTime alone

Identifiers

PMID40398317
PMCPMC12233032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.