Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397953›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Prediction of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Outcome in Critically Ill-Ventilated Patients Using Deep Learning: Development and Verification Study.

Hui-Chiao Yang, Angelica Te-Hui Hao, Shih-Chia Liu, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yao-Te Tsai, Shao-Jen Weng, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chen-Yu Wang, Yeong-Yuh Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hui-Chiao YangDepartment of Chest Medicine, Division of Respiratory Therapy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0004-9646-5052
Angelica Te-Hui HaoDepartment of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-3397
Shih-Chia LiuDepartment of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0392-8707
Yu-Cheng ChangDepartment of Computer and Communications Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0007-0165-4750
Yao-Te TsaiDepartment of Information Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3158-1517
Shao-Jen WengDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-6775
Ming-Cheng ChanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-8841
Chen-Yu WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-0565
Yeong-Yuh XuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0006-5794-9948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term ventilator-dependent patients often face problems such as decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and increased medical costs. Respiratory therapists must perform complex and time-consuming ventilator weaning assessments, which typically take 48-72 hours. Traditional disengagement methods rely on manual evaluation and are susceptible to subjectivity, human errors, and low efficiency.

objectiveThis study aims to develop an artificial intelligence-based prediction model to predict whether a patient can successfully pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) using the patient's clinical data collected before SBT initiation. Instead of comparing different SBT strategies or analyzing their impact on extubation success, this study focused on establishing a data-driven approach under a fixed SBT strategy to provide an objective and efficient assessment tool. Through this model, we aim to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of ventilator weaning assessments, reduce unnecessary SBT attempts, optimize intensive care unit resource usage, and ultimately improve the quality of care for ventilator-dependent patients.

methodsThis study used a retrospective cohort study and developed a novel deep learning architecture, hybrid CNN-MLP (convolutional neural network-multilayer perceptron), for analysis. Unlike the traditional CNN-MLP classification method, hybrid CNN-MLP performs feature learning and fusion by interleaving CNN and MLP layers so that data features can be extracted and integrated at different levels, thereby improving the flexibility and prediction accuracy of the model. The study participants were patients aged 20 years or older hospitalized in the intensive care unit of a medical center in central Taiwan between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. A total of 3686 patients were included in the study, and 6536 pre-SBT clinical records were collected before each SBT of these patients, of which 3268 passed the SBT and 3268 failed.

resultsThe model performed well in predicting SBT outcomes. The training dataset's precision is 99.3% (2443/2460 records), recall is 93.5% (2443/2614 records), specificity is 99.3% (2597/2614 records), and F

conclusionsThis study successfully developed a deep learning-based SBT prediction model that can be used as an objective and efficient ventilator weaning assessment tool. The model's performance shows that it can be integrated into clinical workflow, improve the quality of patient care, and reduce ventilator dependence, which is an important step in improving the effectiveness of respiratory therapy.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessDeep LearningRespirationRespiration, ArtificialVentilator WeaningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligencedeep learningintensive care unitneural networksrespiratory therapyspontaneous breathing trialventilatorventilator weaning

Identifiers

PMID40397953
PMCPMC12138301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.