ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Identifying Disinformation on the Extended Impacts of COVID-19: Methodological Investigation Using a Fuzzy Ranking Ensemble of Natural Language Processing Models.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the continuous spread of misinformation on the internet posed an ongoing threat to public trust and understanding of epidemic prevention policies. Although the pandemic is now under control, information regarding the risks of long-term COVID-19 effects and reinfection still needs to be integrated into COVID-19 policies.
objectiveThis study aims to develop a robust and generalizable deep learning framework for detecting misinformation related to the prolonged impacts of COVID-19 by integrating pretrained language models (PLMs) with an innovative fuzzy rank-based ensemble approach.
methodsA comprehensive dataset comprising 566 genuine and 2361 fake samples was curated from reliable open sources and processed using advanced techniques. The dataset was randomly split using the scikit-learn package to facilitate both training and evaluation. Deep learning models were trained for 20 epochs on a Tesla T4 for hierarchical attention networks (HANs) and an RTX A5000 (for the other models). To enhance performance, we implemented an ensemble learning strategy that incorporated a reparameterized Gompertz function, which assigned fuzzy ranks based on each model's prediction confidence for each test case. This method effectively fused outputs from state-of-the-art PLMs such as robustly optimized bidirectional encoder representations from transformers pretraining approach (RoBERTa), decoding-enhanced bidirectional encoder representations from transformers with disentangled attention (DeBERTa), and XLNet.
resultsAfter training on the dataset, various classification methods were evaluated on the test set, including the fuzzy rank-based method and state-of-the-art large language models. Experimental results reveal that language models, particularly XLNet, outperform traditional approaches that combine term frequency-inverse document frequency features with support vector machine or utilize deep models like HAN. The evaluation metrics-including accuracy, precision, recall, F
conclusionsThe fusion of ensemble learning with PLMs and the Gompertz function, employing fuzzy rank-based methodology, introduces a novel prediction approach with prospects for enhancing accuracy and reliability. Additionally, the experimental results imply that training solely on textual content can yield high prediction accuracy, thereby providing valuable insights into the optimization of fake news detection systems. These findings not only aid in detecting misinformation but also have broader implications for the application of advanced deep learning techniques in public health policy and communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.