ReviewPLoS computational biology2025
Vertex models capturing subcellular scales in epithelial tissues.
Review in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Mitotic shape changes drive spatiotemporally segregated cell-contact rearrangements in a proliferating epithelium.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Cell competition driven by secreted ligands: Modeling liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Biophysics of lumen morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Stress Inference in Retinal Pigment Epithelium in C57BL/6J Mouse.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Necking of epithelial tissues with cellular topological transition.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vertex models provide a robust theoretical framework for studying epithelial tissues as a network of cell boundaries. They have been pivotal in exploring properties such as cell packing geometry and rigidity transitions. Recently, extended vertex models have become instrumental in bridging the subcellular scales to the tissue scale. Here, we review extensions of the model aiming to capture experimentally observed subcellular features of epithelial tissues including heterogeneity in myosin activity across the tissue, non-uniform contractility structures, and mechanosensitive feedback loops. We discuss how these extensions change and challenge current perspectives on observables of macroscopic tissue properties. First, we find that extensions to the vertex model can change model properties significantly, impacting the critical threshold and in some cases even the existence of a rigidity transition. Second, we find that packing disorder can be explained by models employing different subcellular mechanisms, indicating a source of stochasticity and gradual local size changes as common mesoscopic motifs in the mechanics of tissue organization. We address complementary models and statistical inference, putting vertex models in a broader methodological context and we give a brief overview of software packages utilized in increasingly complex vertex model studies. Our review emphasizes the need for more comparative, systematic studies that identify specific classes of vertex models which share a set of well-defined properties, as well as a more in-depth discussion of modeling choices and their biological motivations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.