Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397935›Full record

Trial reportJMIR formative research2025

An Internet-Based and Mobile Family Management Intervention for Mothers of Very Preterm Infants Hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (the Preemie Progress Program): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ashley Weber, Tamilyn Bakas, Qutaibah Oudat, Nehal A Parikh, Joshua Lambert, Heather L Tubbs-Cooley, Jared Rice, Kristin Voos, Matthew Rota, Heather C Kaplan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04638127 (PREEMIE PROGRESS), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04638127 nacompletednot on this map

PREEMIE PROGRESS: A Family Management Program for Parents of Preterm Infants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CincinnatiRan2022 to 2023Enrolled64ConditionsPremature Infant Disease, Family Research, Parent-Child Relations, Self EfficacyArmsPREEMIE PROGRESS, Attention Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ashley WeberDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-2521
Tamilyn BakasDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-5012
Qutaibah OudatDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2167-7371
Nehal A ParikhNeurodevelopmental Disorders Prevention Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1375-1247
Joshua LambertDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3195-8735
Heather L Tubbs-CooleyPitzer Center for Women, Children, and Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1662-1368
Jared RiceDepartment of Population Health, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3137-6305
Kristin VoosDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-1339-3994
Matthew RotaOffice of Learning Design and Digital Innovation, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-121X
Heather C KaplanDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-2781

Funding

PREEMIE PROGRESS: A family management program for parents of preterm infantsK23NR019081 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WEBER, ASHLEY M. · 2020 to 2022
$455k
NINR NIH HHS K23 NR019081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlexible approaches to parenting training interventions in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including family integrated care (FICare) models, are urgently needed across the globe. Many FICare trials inadvertently exclude parents with low resources who cannot commit to daily infant care (eg, 4-8 hours/day). Preemie Progress (PP) is a fully automated, video-based training program that allows parents to choose when and where they learn, without requiring parent bedside presence.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the feasibility of recruitment, retention, fidelity, and changes in outcomes during a pilot randomized controlled trial of PP, a video-based intervention aimed at training mothers of very preterm infants in evidence-based family management skills in the NICU.

methodsMothers of infants born between 25 weeks and 0 days to 31 weeks and 6 days of gestation were enrolled in an NICU in the Midwestern United States. Electronic surveys were sent to collect maternal outcomes (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] 8a depression and anxiety scales) at baseline (T1), 14 days (T2) and 28 days (T3) after T1, and 30 days after NICU discharge (T4). Infant electronic health records were extracted to collect infant (ie, weight gain velocity at 36 weeks and receipt of mother's milk) and health care outcomes (ie, NICU length of stay as well as readmissions and emergency department visits within 30 days of discharge).

resultsOf 123 eligible mothers, 64 (52%) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 arms (PP: n=33, 52%; attention control [AC]: n=31, 48%). Loss to follow-up was 30% (10/33) in the PP arm and 13% (4/31) in the AC arm. PP mothers watched a mean 17.8 (SD 18.9) of 49 videos. PP retention was linked to higher fidelity. PP mothers showed trends toward greater reductions in anxiety 30 days after discharge (mean -7.54, SD 1.93; 95% CI -11.32 to -3.76) compared to AC mothers (mean -4.67, SD 1.59; 95% CI -7.80 to -1.55). PP infants trended toward greater receipt of exclusively mother's milk 28 days after baseline (PP: 14/26, 54%; AC: 10/28, 36%) and decreased NICU stay (PP: 57.2 days; AC: 68.3 days) but higher readmissions (PP: 4/33, 12%; AC: 2/31, 6%).

conclusionsWe were able to recruit a diverse sample of mothers from a range of socioeconomic backgrounds, including mothers experiencing barriers to bedside presence. Recruitment goals were met. PP showed promising trends in improving maternal, infant, and health care outcomes. Additional studies are needed to optimize PP and study procedures to improve retention and fidelity. PP has the potential to support parent training outside of traditional FICare models or serve as a complement to structure the parent education pillar of adapted FICare models.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04638127; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04638127.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureInternet-Based InterventionMothersAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMidwestern United StatesPilot Projectsfamily integrated carefamily nursingneonatal intensive care unitsparentspreterm infantself-management

Identifiers

PMID40397935
PMCPMC12138314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.