ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning model based on survey assessment of sleep quality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim is to develop a learning model based on clinical and survey data to assess sleep quality and identify determining factors affecting sleep quality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
methodsThe Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was administered to stable COPD patients to assess sleep quality. Patients were categorized into two groups: good sleep quality and poor sleep quality. Parameters for the best model were selected from a total of 61 clinical and laboratory parameters using recursive feature elimination (RFE) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). A logistic regression (LR) model was created. The model was evaluated using nested cross-validation with 5 inner and 5 outer folds, and this process was repeated with 1000 bootstrap iterations. Results were obtained with a 95% CI.
resultsThe mean age of the 132 patients was 66.68 ± 8.16 years, with a predominance of males (117, or 88.6%). Of the 132 patients, 68 were in the poor sleep quality group. In this group, the prevalence of dyspnea, snoring, witnessed apneas, and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was higher. The parameters included in the model and occurrence rates in the poor sleep quality group are as follows: annual exacerbation and hospitalization (71.9%), presence of EDS (35.9%), cough (64.1%), active smoking (95.4%), short-acting beta agonist (SABA) requirement (59.4%), pH level, and coronary artery disease (CAD) (20.3%). In our final model, the test set demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 70.21%, 71.76%, 70.99%, and 0.757, respectively.
conclusionOur machine learning model, developed using clinical data of COPD patients, can predict their sleep quality. We found that high annual exacerbation and hospitalization rates, the presence of EDS and cough symptoms, active smoking, and regular use of SABA as well as high pH levels, negatively affect sleep quality. Conversely, the presence of CAD under treatment in patients positively affects sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.