Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397865›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Balancing prior knowledge and sensory data in a predictive coding model of coherent motion detection.

Elnaz Nemati, David B Grayden, Anthony N Burkitt, Parvin Zarei Eskikand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elnaz NematiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David B GraydenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anthony N BurkittDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Parvin Zarei EskikandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-6445

Funding

University of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a neurobiologically inspired computational model based on the predictive coding algorithm, providing insights into coherent motion detection processes. The model is designed to reflect key principles observed in the visual system, particularly MT neurons and their surround suppression mechanisms, which play a critical role in detecting global motion. By integrating these principles, the model simulates how motion structures are decomposed into individual and shared sources, mirroring the brain's strategy for extracting coherent motion patterns. The results obtained from random dot stimuli underscore the delicate balance between sensory data and prior knowledge in motion detection. Model testing across varying noise levels reveals that, as noise increases, the model takes longer to stabilize its motion estimates, consistent with psychophysical experiments showing that response duration (e.g., reaction time or decision-making time) also increases under higher noise conditions. The model suggests that an excessive emphasis on prior knowledge prolongs the stabilization time for motion detection, whereas an optimal integration of prior expectations enhances detection accuracy and efficiency by preventing excessive disturbances due to noise. These findings contribute to potential explanations for motion detection deficiencies observed in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansNeuronsPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40397865
PMCPMC12133192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.