Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397833›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on SMOTE-Tomek sampling and machine learning algorithm.

Ming-Zhou Lv, Kun-Lun Li, Jia-Zeng Cai, Jun Mao, Jia-Jun Gao, Hui Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming-Zhou LvSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Kun-Lun LiZhenan Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute, Lishui, China.
Jia-Zeng CaiZhenan Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute, Lishui, China.
Jun MaoZhenan Comprehensive Engineering Surveying and Mapping Institute, Lishui, China.
Jia-Jun GaoSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Hui XuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-8975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landslides are frequent and hazardous geological disasters, posing significant risks to human safety and infrastructure. Accurate assessments of landslide susceptibility are crucial for risk management and mitigation. However, geological surveys of landslide areas are typically conducted at the township level, have lowsample sizes, and rely on experience. This study proposes a framework for assessing landslide susceptibility in Taiping Township, Zhejiang Province, China, using data balancing, machine learning, and data from 1,325 slope units with nine slope characteristics. The dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and the Tomek link undersampling method (SMOTE-Tomek). A comparative analysis of six machine learning models was performed, and the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to assess the influencing factors. The results indicate that the machine learning algorithms provide high accuracy, and the random forest (RF) algorithm achieves the optimum model accuracy (0.791, F1 = 0.723). The very low, low, medium, and high sensitivity zones account for 92.27%, 5.12%, 1.78%, and 0.83% of the area, respectively. The height of cut slopes has the most significant impact on landslide sensitivity, whereas the altitude has a minor impact. The proposed model accurately assesses landslide susceptibility at the township scale, providing valuable insights for risk management and mitigation.

Indexed as

LandslidesMachine LearningAlgorithmsChinaHumans

Identifiers

PMID40397833
PMCPMC12094760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.