ArticlePloS one2025
Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on SMOTE-Tomek sampling and machine learning algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Landslides are frequent and hazardous geological disasters, posing significant risks to human safety and infrastructure. Accurate assessments of landslide susceptibility are crucial for risk management and mitigation. However, geological surveys of landslide areas are typically conducted at the township level, have lowsample sizes, and rely on experience. This study proposes a framework for assessing landslide susceptibility in Taiping Township, Zhejiang Province, China, using data balancing, machine learning, and data from 1,325 slope units with nine slope characteristics. The dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and the Tomek link undersampling method (SMOTE-Tomek). A comparative analysis of six machine learning models was performed, and the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to assess the influencing factors. The results indicate that the machine learning algorithms provide high accuracy, and the random forest (RF) algorithm achieves the optimum model accuracy (0.791, F1 = 0.723). The very low, low, medium, and high sensitivity zones account for 92.27%, 5.12%, 1.78%, and 0.83% of the area, respectively. The height of cut slopes has the most significant impact on landslide sensitivity, whereas the altitude has a minor impact. The proposed model accurately assesses landslide susceptibility at the township scale, providing valuable insights for risk management and mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.