Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397759›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025

Health worker perspectives on Greenlandic healthcare - resources, sustainability and work-life-balance.

T Aagaard, L Seibæk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T AagaardGreenland Centre of Health Research, Institute of Health and Nature, Ilisimatusarfik/University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland.
L SeibækAarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greenland faces severe challenges with the recruitment and retention of health workers. A healthcare reform from 2010 did not have the expected effect. On this background we explored health worker perspectives on barriers and opportunities for improvements. To generate knowledge of opportunities and challenges in delivering culturally relevant healthcare, and knowledge of conditions for developing a sustainable work environment. Interviews with healthcare staff from all regions were carried out and analysed within a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach. Although better cohesion of healthcare and improved communication across health units was experienced, lack of support, training, and high staff turnover overloaded the permanent staff leading to staff flight and increased use of short-term health workers. Following a need among the population, health workers call for increased focus on health promotion. They request leadership that includes local knowledge and skills to prioritise, organise and develop culturally safe healthcare, based also on the perspectives of service users. Greenland has dedicated health workers holding local knowledge of significance for care and treatment. Prioritisation of health promotion is considered necessary and satisfactory but must be supported by strategic leadership. Further, a satisfactory work-life seems closely related to recruitment and retention.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCulturally Competent CareHealth PersonnelWork-Life BalanceFemaleGreenlandHealth Care ReformHealth ResourcesHumansInterviews as TopicMalePersonnel TurnoverQualitative ResearchSustainable DevelopmentWorkplacehealth promotionHealth worker perspectivesinclusive leadershiprecruitment and retentionsustainable work life

Identifiers

PMID40397759
PMCPMC12123956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.