Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397739›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Poorly quantified trends in ammonium nitrate remain critical to understand future urban aerosol control strategies.

Ryan X Ward, Haroula D Baliaka, Benjamin C Schulze, Gaige H Kerr, John D Crounse, Sina Hasheminassab, Roya Bahreini, Ann M Dillner, Armistead Russell, Nga L Ng and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Field Evaluation of Community Condensation Particle Counters, Optical Particle Counters, and a Low-Cost Particle Sensor.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryan X WardCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2317-3310
Haroula D BaliakaCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7851-8449
Benjamin C SchulzeCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Gaige H KerrGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-0752
John D CrounseCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5443-729X
Sina HasheminassabCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Roya BahreiniUniversity of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-5338
Ann M DillnerUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-754X
Armistead RussellGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-8870
Nga L NgGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-4765
Paul O WennbergCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6126-3854
Richard C FlaganCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5690-770X
John H SeinfeldCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-4068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite decades of progress in reducing nitrogen oxide (NO

Identifiers

PMID40397739
PMCPMC12094242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.