ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Average Responses of Brain Displacement Under Rotational Loading for Computational Model Validation.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal characterization of intracranial biomechanics in a 3D biofidelic head surrogate.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveComputational models of the brain are typically validated using individual subjects from datasets of brain motion, but a comparison to an individual subject does not consider the biomechanical variation that naturally exists in the population. When data from multiple subjects is available, biomechanical corridors are constructed for the assessment of model biofidelity. However, a robust set of corridors for brain's biomechanical response due to applied head kinematics does not exist for model validation. The aim of this study was to create corridors based on a dataset of in situ brain displacement that included six specimens tested under a set of twelve loading conditions.
methodsThere were three main factors that complicated this task, including variation in head kinematics, differences in the initial position of the sensors, and the clustering of spatially scattered data. We employed various numerical and statistical methods to account for these experimental variations, with optimization and validation of the techniques conducted using the existing in situ dataset and a computational brain model.
resultsCorridors were constructed using average and standard deviation of the specimen responses in the dataset for 24 discrete locations within the brain. Peak displacement showed a variance of less than 30% for most brain sensor locations.
conclusionThe corridors will serve as a better validation tool for assessing the biofidelity of computational brain models and will help understand inter-subject variability in brain biomechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.