Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397500›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-Risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for the CarDIA-AI Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jeremy Petch, Juan Pablo Tabja Bortesi, Tej Sheth, Madhu Natarajan, Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri, Shuang Di, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Karen Mosleh, Omar Ibrahim, Kevin R Bainey and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06648239 (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06648239 nacompletednot on this map

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography for Low-risk Patients Screened With Artificial Intelligence

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2025 to 2026Enrolled251ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsUsual Care, Centralized triage with risk score-based screening for obstructive CAD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jeremy PetchPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-1046
Juan Pablo Tabja BortesiCentre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-1631-5165
Tej ShethPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-4651-8310
Madhu NatarajanPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6372-1348
Natalia Pinilla-EcheverriPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7784-0348
Shuang DiCentre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-7613
Shrikant I BangdiwalaPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-0689
Karen MoslehCentre for Evidence-Based Implementation, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9009-3452
Omar IbrahimPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-182X
Kevin R BaineyMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-4617
Julian DobranowskiDepartment of Medical Imaging, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-3502
Maria P BecerraCentre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-4660
Katie SonierCentre for Data Science and Digital Health, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-2590-4098
Jon-David SchwalmPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-4952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Being invasive, it carries rare but serious risks including myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding, and death. A large proportion of elective outpatients undergoing ICA have nonobstructive CAD, highlighting the suboptimal use of this test. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive option that provides similar information with less risk and is recommended as a first-line test for patients with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to appropriately direct patients to ICA or CCTA based on the predicted probability of disease may improve the efficiency and safety of diagnostic pathways.

objectivehe CarDIA-AI (Coronary computed tomographic angiography to optimize the Diagnostic yield of Invasive Angiography for low-risk patients screened with Artificial Intelligence) study aims to evaluate whether AI-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD implemented within a centralized triage process can optimize the use of ICA in outpatients referred for nonurgent ICA.

methodsCarDIA-AI is a pragmatic, open-label, superior randomized controlled trial involving 2 Canadian cardiac centers. A total of 252 adults referred for elective outpatient ICA will be randomized 1:1 to usual care (directly proceeding to ICA) or to triage using an AI-based decision support tool. The AI-based decision support tool was developed using referral information from over 37,000 patients and uses a light gradient boosting machine model to predict the probability of obstructive CAD based on 42 clinically relevant predictors, including patient referral information, demographic characteristics, risk factors, and medical history. Participants in the intervention arm will have their ICA referral forms and medical charts reviewed, and select details entered into the decision support tool, which recommends CCTA or ICA based on the patient's predicted probability of obstructive CAD. All patients will receive the selected imaging modality within 6 weeks of referral and will be subsequently followed for 90 days. The primary outcome is the proportion of normal or nonobstructive CAD diagnosed via ICA and will be assessed using a 2-sided z test to compare the patients referred for cardiac investigation with normal or nonobstructive CAD diagnosed through ICA between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes include the number of angiograms avoided and the diagnostic yield of ICA.

resultsRecruitment began on January 9, 2025, and is expected to conclude in mid to late 2025. As of April 14, 2025, we have enrolled 81 participants. Data analysis will begin once data collection is completed. We expect to submit the results for publication in 2026.

conclusionsCarDIA-AI will be the first randomized controlled trial using AI to optimize patient selection for CCTA versus ICA, potentially improving diagnostic efficiency, avoiding unnecessary complications of ICA, and improving health care resource usage.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06648239; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06648239/. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/71726.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Assessmentartificial intelligenceclinical decision supportcoronary artery diseasecoronary computed tomographic angiographyinvasive coronary angiography

Identifiers

PMID40397500
PMCPMC12138305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.