Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397492›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

The Impact of Mechanisms of Action on Adherence and Outcomes in Self-Guided Digital Mental Health Interventions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Mediation Analysis.

Amit Baumel, Idan M Aderka

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06514326 (The Impact of Mechanisms of Action on Adherence and Outcomes in Unguided Digital Mental Health Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06514326 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Mechanisms of Action on Adherence and Outcomes in Unguided Digital Mental Health Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HaifaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled172ConditionsDPT-STD, DPT-TPArmsDPT-TP, DPT-STD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amit BaumelDepartment of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7043-8898
Idan M AderkaDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-9925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the main recognizable challenges in the digital mental health interventions field is that users adhere to these interventions in their unguided forms poorly. Studies have shown that a persuasive system design focused on encouraging users to make positive behavior changes in their lives can increase user engagement and a program's efficacy. This design approach can be referred to as therapeutic persuasiveness (TP) and includes a call to action, monitoring, ongoing feedback, and program adaptation based on user state. The goal of this study is to examine the causal impact of TP on program completion and outcomes in unguided digital mental interventions. We aim to examine these questions in digital parent training programs (DPTs) aimed at treating children's behavior problems.

objectiveThis study aims to (1) examine the impact of TP quality on usage, reduction in child behavior problems, and improvement in parenting variables; (2) examine the maintenance of treatment gains over a follow-up period; and (3) examine mediational pathways, including whether adherence to the program (measured by module completion rates) mediates reported changes.

methodsA randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare 2 interventions that use the same evidence-based components of established DPTs, but that differ in terms of the quality of TP (standard: DPT-STD; enhanced TP: DPT-TP). We will recruit parents from 160 families with children aged 3-7 years with behavior problems who will be randomized into one of the 2 intervention arms. We will measure child behavior problems and related parenting variables at 5 time points: before (T1), during (T2 and T3), and after the intervention (T4 and T5). Program usage will be passively collected.

resultsThe study was funded in October 2023, and enrollment began in September 2024. As of the end of December 2024, 100 participants were enrolled in the study. Analyses are expected to be completed by September 2027.

conclusionsIdentifying conceptual scientific theories that draw a link between active ingredients embedded within a digital intervention function and their outcomes is crucial in advancing our understanding of what influences usage and outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06514326; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06514326. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/71238.

Indexed as

ParentsChildFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthParentingRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicactive ingredientsclinical trialdigital parent trainingmechanisms of actionmechanisms of changepersuasive designusageuser engagement

Identifiers

PMID40397492
PMCPMC12138313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.