Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397486›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025

Management of Low Colorectal/Coloanal Anastomotic Leak: Results of a French National Intergroups Practice Survey (FRENCH-GRECCAR-SFCD).

Clément Pastier, Wafa Ben Hmida, Jérémie H Lefèvre, Quentin Denost, Lilian Schwarz, Stéphane Berdah, Eddy Cotte, Mehdi Karoui, Léon Maggiori, Solafah Abdalla and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clément PastierDepartment of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-3999
Wafa Ben HmidaDepartment of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Jérémie H LefèvreDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Quentin DenostDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Bordeaux Colorectal Institute, Bordeaux, France.
Lilian SchwarzDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Stéphane BerdahDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Nord Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Eddy CotteDepartment of General and Surgical Oncology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Mehdi KarouiDepartment of Gastro-Intestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Léon MaggioriDepartment of General-Endocrine and Digestive Surgery, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Solafah AbdallaDepartment of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-9497
Antoine BrouquetDepartment of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Stéphane BenoistDepartment of Oncologic and Digestive Surgery, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8087-7894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAnastomotic leakage (AL) impacts short-term and long-term outcomes after colorectal surgery, yet no consensus exists regarding its diagnosis and management. The aim was to establish a proactive consensus-based approach for diagnosing and treating AL following rectal cancer surgery through a national survey.

methodsA questionnaire was designed to assess 24 clinical scenarios related to the diagnosis and management of fistulas in low colorectal (LCA) or coloanal anastomosis (CAA) with a diverting ileostomy.

resultsA total of 203 surgeons from three surgical societies participated. Consensus was reached on four key indicators warranting further investigation of AL: CRP > 250 mg/L, fever ≥ 38.5°C, tachycardia > 100 bpm, and diffuse abdominal pain. In the presence of any warning sign, 87% recommended an urgent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan without routine rectal contrast as the first-line diagnostic tool. Isolated extra-digestive air bubbles or uncollected effusions without air bubbles were managed with antibiotics (61%-78%). A perianastomotic collection required an anal examination under general anesthesia (70%). For treatment, transanal drainage (56%) was preferred over image-guided percutaneous drainage, combined with endoluminal vacuum therapy and at least 7 days of antibiotics (97%). Drain removal was recommended (64%) when imaging confirmed the absence of residual collection.

conclusionsThis national survey established a consensus-driven proactive management algorithm for LCA/CAA fistulas. Further validation controlled trial is needed to confirm the effectiveness in reducing AL-related complications.

Indexed as

Anal CanalAnastomotic LeakColonPractice Patterns, Physicians'Rectal NeoplasmsRectumAnastomosis, SurgicalConsensusDrainageFemaleFranceHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairescoloanal anastomotic fistulacolorectal anastomotic fistulastoma

Identifiers

PMID40397486
PMCPMC12282568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.