Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40397443›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Experiences With VA-Purchased Community Care for US Veterans With Mental Health Conditions.

Megan E Vanneman, Eric T Roberts, Yaming Li, Florentina E Sileanu, Utibe R Essien, Maria K Mor, Michael J Fine, Carolyn T Thorpe, Thomas R Radomski, Katie J Suda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Hit or Miss": Rural Veterans' Experiences Receiving Community Mental Health Care.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Megan E VannemanVeterans Affairs (VA) Informatics, Decision Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Eric T RobertsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Yaming LiVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Florentina E SileanuVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Utibe R EssienDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Maria K MorVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Michael J FineVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn T ThorpeVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Thomas R RadomskiVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Katie J SudaVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Walid F GelladVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX003457HSRD VA IK2 HX002625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Veterans with mental health conditions (MHC) face unique challenges obtaining high-quality, coordinated health care. With a growing number of veterans receiving VA-purchased community care (CC) provided outside the Veterans Health Administration (VA), evidence is needed on how veterans in this high-prevalence, marginalized subgroup experience CC. Objective: To compare experiences with CC over time for US veterans with and without MHC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, cross-sectional survey study analyzed responses to the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Community Care Survey (SHEP-CCS) from 2016 to 2021. Ratings of CC were examined across 9 domains and compared for veterans with and without MHC, adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics using regression models. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to September 2024. Exposure: Diagnosis of MHC, defined as bipolar disorder, major depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, or psychosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Veterans' ratings of CC across 9 domains, overall satisfaction, overall clinician rating, clinician communication, eligibility determination, first appointment access, recent appointment access, nonappointment access, care coordination, and billing, were assessed on a scale of 1 to 100. Unadjusted annual ratings of care experiences were analyzed by survey domain. A series of 4 respondent-level linear regression models were examined for each domain and survey responses were pooled to test for differences in experiences between veterans with vs without MHC. Results: This study included 231 869 veterans, including 62 911 veterans with MHC (27.1%) and 168 958 without MHC (72.9%). Veterans with MHC had a mean (SD) age of 55.8 (14.7) years, 8327 were female (18.5%), and 24 792 had 3 or more comorbidities (29.9%). Veterans without MHC had a mean (SD) age of 62.5 (15.2) years, 11 277 were female (11.0%), and 49 689 had 3 or more comorbidities (24.0%). In fully adjusted models, veterans with vs without MHC had lower adjusted overall satisfaction with CC by -1.8 (95% CI, -2.3 to -1.3) points (P < .001). Ratings in all domains were lower for veterans with vs without MHC (-0.09 to -0.05 SDs of domain scores) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Although ratings improved from 2016 to 2021, significant differences persisted over time for veterans with vs without MHC for all domains. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of veterans receiving CC from 2016 to 2021, those diagnosed with MHC reported lower ratings of CC across all measured domains, and these differences persisted over time. These findings highlight where focused care coordination and quality improvement efforts could improve CC experiences for this vulnerable subpopulation of veterans.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPatient SatisfactionVeteransVeterans Health ServicesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID40397443
PMCPMC12096262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.