ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2025
The Influence of Bee Movements on Patterns of Pollen Transfer between Plants: An Exploratory Model.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Influence of Bee Movements on Patterns of Pollen Transfer between Plants: An Exploratory Model.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most-if not all-pollinators make foraging decisions based on learning and memory. In interaction with environmental conditions and competitive pressure, pollinators' cognition shapes their movement patterns, which in turn determine pollen transfers. However, models of animal-mediated pollination often make simplifying assumptions about pollinator movements, notably by not incorporating learning and memory. Better considering cognition as a driver of pollinators' movements may thus provide a powerful mechanistic understanding of pollen dispersal. In this exploratory study, we connect pollinator behavior and plant reproduction by using an agent-based model of bee movements implementing reinforcement learning. Simulations of two bees foraging together in environments containing twenty plants show how learning can improve foraging efficiency as well as plant pollination quality through larger mating distances and smaller self-pollination rates while creating spatially heterogeneous pollen flows. This suggests that pollinators' informed foraging decisions contribute to genetic differentiation between plant subpopulations. We believe this theoretical exploration will pave the way for a more systematic analysis of animal-mediated plant mating patterns, as model predictions can be tested experimentally in real bee-plant systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.