ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Natural Toolbox-Chemical Engineering Aspect and High-Value Applications of Janus Cellulose Nanomaterials.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Peptide Nanoassemblies: Design, Response Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Carbon Dots Derived fromInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Natural Toolbox-Chemical Engineering Aspect and High-Value Applications of Janus Cellulose Nanomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative force, enabling the manipulation and engineering of materials at the nanoscale level, which has led to the discovery and development of novel materials with unique properties and functionalities. Janus cellulose nanomaterials, a product of nanotechnology, have attracted significant attention. This article aims to address the current lack of fundamental mechanistic understanding in Janus cellulose by investigating the intrinsic relationship between structural design and functional performance. Specifically, it begins by elucidating the construction principles of Janus cellulose nanomaterials, with a particular focus on how their asymmetric architectures impart anisotropic physicochemical properties, such as interfacial tension modulation, directional interactions, and selective transport. By integrating multiscale modeling approaches-including molecular dynamics simulations and density functional theory calculations-the underlying interfacial behaviors and assembly pathways are revealed, providing theoretical insight into their conformational stability and dynamic response mechanisms. It also explores how surface functionalization and selective chemical modification strategies can be leveraged to finetune hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity balance and interfacial activity, thereby enabling precise control over Janus cellulose interface configuration and functional attributes. On this basis, it further examines non-covalent driving forces-including electrostatic interactions, van der Waals forces, and hydrogen bonding-within the self-assembly process, and systematically maps the relationship between assembly conditions and structural evolution. This work establishes a comprehensive structure-driving force-assembly process-property framework, offering theoretical support and design guidance for the development of high-performance Janus cellulose nanomaterials in advanced applications such as flexible electronics, smart sensing systems, controlled drug delivery, and energy conversion and storage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.