ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025
Performance of a smell identification test versus the Mini-Mental Status Exam for the detection of dementia and cognitive impairment among persons with cognitive concerns in primary care.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundOdor identification deficits predict Alzheimer's disease (AD) in epidemiological studies.ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of a short odor identification test with a short cognitive screening test for the detection of dementia and cognitive impairment in elderly persons with cognitive concerns.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 600 participants 65 years and older, without known mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, with cognitive concerns, attending primary care practices in New York City. The odor identification test was the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT). The comparator test was the Mini Mental Status Exam II (MMSE). Cognitive diagnoses were made using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data set (NACC-UDS) version 3 forms with slight modifications. Test performance was compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses.ResultsThe mean age was 72.65 ± 6.31 years, 73.3% were female, 63.3% were Hispanic, 13.5% non-Hispanic Black, and 20.8% non-Hispanic White; 23.5% were classified as normal cognition, 27.7% as cognitive impairment-not mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 31.2% as amnestic MCI, 5.7% as non-amnestic MCI, and 12% as dementia. The MMSE was superior to the BSIT in detecting dementia and any cognitive impairment. Combining abnormal scores in the BSIT (≤8) to MMSE (≤24) improved the MMSE's specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) in detecting cognitive impairment.ConclusionsThe MMSE was superior to the BSIT in detecting dementia and cognitive impairment in primary care but using both tests improved specificity and PPV for identifying persons with subjective complaints needing further cognitive and biomarker evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.